Search for: "Roberts v. Casey" Results 261 - 280 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Comer, and Espinoza v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu expand on a previous post for this blog on The American Legion v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 9, 2012 released the following: "Part of Operation Eagle Eye United States Attorney Brendan V. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:23 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on August 9, 2012 released the following: "Part of Operation Eagle Eye United States Attorney Brendan V. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
Casey to strike down a Pennsylvania provision that generally required women seeking abortions to notify their husbands; he joined a 5-3 majority in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Garrow highlights Chief Justice John Roberts’ commitment to stare decisis, and like Spindelman, believes that Roberts’ concurrence in June Medical made Casey harder to overturn. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:38 am by David Lat
The complaint lists Nixon partners Edward O’Callaghan, William Kelly, and Robert Bernius and associate Matthew Grazier as also playing roles in the NewPoint representation. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The “major questions doctrine” popped up throughout recent public health decisions and became formally recognized in Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Peter Smith and Robert Tuttle analyze last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
Casey applied an undue burden test to abortion restrictions, a significant shift from the strict scrutiny test applied in the 1973 case Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 3:53 pm by Josh Blackman
What better way to virtue signal and promote bipartisanship then to vote to uphold Roe v. [read post]