Search for: "SHELL OIL CO" Results 261 - 280 of 475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
"Finally, chronic stomach cramp-sufferers may consider decorating a Christmas tree for the bathroom: According to a 2008 study by researchers at McMaster University, peppermint oil -- found in most candy canes --  is an effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
nco’s refinery, a pollutant classified by the federal government as a group one-carcinogenic toxic substance.3 Once Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) discovered the true extent and levels of Inco’s nickel depositions, Port Colborne became the subject of extreme environmental scrutiny, risk assessments, scientific testing, regulatory intervention, unprecedented media publicity and health studies lasting almost 2 St Lawrence Cement; Imperial Oil Ltd… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[15] One such example is the landmark $352 million Royal Dutch Shell settlement, which arose from allegations by European investors that Shell overstated its oil and gas reserves.[16] As such, the Netherlands might be the new “place to [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Shell Oil Co., here in the Third Circuit (PA, NJ, DE, USVI) post-employment retaliation is bad, bad, bad. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Corporate Action Network
  Had Shell immediately stopped the spills and cleaned up the oil, the company could have prevented the devastation to the Bodo community. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
Shell Oil Company (Docket Report) Aston Martin – Another e-mail discovery ruling: Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm by WIMS
[#Air] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)House Committee Approves Pipeline & Boiler, Cement MACT BillsEPA Issues Shell Air Permits For Arctic Sea Drilling; Enviros ObjectGOP Presses DOE On Solyndra; Execs Take The 5thDOE Touts Jobs & Advances In Weatherization & Green EnergyTechnology Roadmap On CCS In Industrial Applications Minard Run Oil Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Mineral rights owners are entitled to reasonable use of the surface to drill for oil or gas and from 1980 until recently the Service and mineral owners had managed drilling in the ANF through a cooperative process. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997), in which the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the term "employee" in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 included former employees. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:38 am by Francis Pileggi
The below article first appeared on Aug. 24, 2011, in The Delaware Business Court Insider, here. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
 (Editors Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Shell Oil posted on August 13, 2010). [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:58 am by Will Aitchison
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997), a decision that has since stood as the definitive authority on statutory construction. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:19 pm
Palm Beach County couple files lawsuit after burning incident, Sun-Sentinel/Palm Beach Post, August 3, 2011 Napa Home and Garden files Chapter 11, Garden Center Magazine, July 11, 2011 Napa Home & Garden Recalls NAPAfire and FIREGEL Pourable Gel Fuel Due to Fire and Burn Hazards, CPSC, June 22, 2011 Related Web Resources: Palm Beach Injury Lawsuit Sues Shell Oil and Circle K for Man’s Burn Injuries from Gas Station Fire, Florida Injury Attorney Blog, July 20, 2010 … [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]