Search for: "Simmons v. Ins*" Results 261 - 280 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Monday’s decisions in Simmons v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, the Appellate Division observed that notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiffs, as retirees, were not involved in the two underlying arbitrations, "the identity of parties is not an element of this doctrine". [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, the Appellate Division observed that notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiffs, as retirees, were not involved in the two underlying arbitrations, "the identity of parties is not an element of this doctrine". [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Simmons and of people of any age for crimes against individuals other than murder last year in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am by Ben
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing "a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime" (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Unlike every other court ruling — federal or state — since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
In order to prevail in the underlying action against the NYCHA on a theory of constructive notice, the plaintiff would have had to introduce evidence of the origin of the particular icy condition that caused her to fall (see Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins Co., 84 NY2d 972; Ciaschi v Taughannock Constr., 204 AD2d 883). [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
With the AmeriKat ensconced in the FRAND panel session (report here), Kat friend and Fordham guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) covered the PTAB panel. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
Porsche had attempted to register an accelerating engine sound as a trade mark; however, after the initial refusal, the Board also confirmed that the sound in question was not sufficiently distinctive to qualify as a trade mark because it was a common sound made by electric vehicles.Katfriend Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons) presented the fourteenth volume of his Retromark update. [read post]