Search for: "Smith & Nephew, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Smith & Nephew, by contrast, contended that “type” referred to a particular polymer – i.e. to the chemistry of the fibre. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:41 am by Phil
The following is excerpted from a June 23, 2011 post at citybizlist of Boston: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Endoscopy Division, a subsidiary of Smith & Nephew plc (NYSE: SNN) (London Stock Exchange: SN) announced today that the jury in United States District Court in Oregon found in Smith & Nephew's favor that Arthrex, Inc., (Naples, Fla.) was guilty of infringing U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 1999 WL 811334, at *24 (Tex. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The bottom line:The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered summary judgment that De- fendants-Appellants Northgate Technologies, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc., and Linvatec Corp. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:09 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Smith & Nephew Inc. will recall more Triad Group products because of a bacterial infection. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Will
Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., 629 N.W.2d 727, 750-51 (Wis. 2001)) in favor of a “reasonable alternative design” standard for proving design defect claims. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
Following a remarkably swift turn-around, the Court of Appeal last Thursday handed down its judgment in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1260.Two patents were in issue: European Patent No. 0 777 504 (‘504) concerning “wound drainage equipment” and No. 0 853 950 (‘950), a divisional of ‘504, concerning “wound drainage canisters” designed to fit in said equipment. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kuku, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2533 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1260 (18 November 2010) Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash [2010] EWCA Civ 1314 (19 November 2010) Tilson v Alstom Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1308 (19 November 2010) Ingram v Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 1313 (19 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) JIH v News… [read post]