Search for: "State v Doles"
Results 261 - 280
of 501
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm
[Recess Appointments] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Alec Baldwin, Arizona, Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
” As proof, he cited Wickard v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
by Lee DavisUNITED STATES v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Interestingly, Nollan v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
In 1996, she was part of a unanimous ruling overturning a death sentence in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
That was in Coyle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Dole, but I note that South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:32 am
Dole. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
Dole. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Gerner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York in United States, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Credit: Metro Realty Sheppard v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
Dole, 870 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1989) which upheld a statute that exempted a project from environmental laws. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
This restriction is potentially at odds with other definitions of universities, such as those contained in Bayh-Dole[11] or the defin [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm
Before this point, the states have not argued that any other Dole element was violated, but the states now seem to indicate that these conditions were not unambiguous and thus the ‘contract’ with the federal government is unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
(I know, I predicted a different outcome in my first post on Florida v. [read post]
