Search for: "State v. Captain"
Results 261 - 280
of 971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 11:37 am
By: Loyd Willaford and Sarah Burke In Coleman-Askew v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
At the time of divorce, Husband had served 14 years in the United States Army and held the rank of Captain. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Staffing levels.Local 191 contended that the City demoted eight fire captains and thus violated the CBA by failing to maintain the requisite staffing levels, and by concomitantly forcing other members of the Fire Department to perform out-of-title work, i.e., fire captain's work, without the appropriate compensation. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:02 am
The most important one is an obscure case called Stern v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:30 am
The victim got back up and told police he stated “You wanna replay that? [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:29 pm
Flynn argues that, while the defense invokes Waller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
Dove v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:49 am
Under the direction of State Police Captain Majenski, “a detail of State troopers and police officers from the town of Abington (the town)” “conduct[ed] a saturation patrol and sobriety checkpoint. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Paging Captain Jean-Luc Picard. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
” Citing Kelly v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:02 am
On June 1, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Borcik v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:02 am
On June 1, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Borcik v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:02 am
On June 1, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Borcik v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:02 am
On June 1, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Borcik v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 2:57 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 2:57 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
