Search for: "State v. Corning" Results 261 - 280 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm by Patti Waller
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court will hear oral argument March 23 in the case of Walker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Case by case v. systematic: the cost of false positives and false negatives; court doesn’t consider the long-run consequences, like Boston Hockey or post-sale confusion. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by SHG
It was a second marriage for both Donna Lou Young and Henry V. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm by Larry
The reason Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]