Search for: "State v. Edward Peoples" Results 261 - 280 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 5:58 am by Nathan Koppel
  Secondly, they point to the fact that states have a duty, enshrined in Gideon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:41 am by Kevin
Writing at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone notes that the Westboro Baptist Church, infamous for picketing funerals for a variety of bizarre and hateful reasons, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
For All the People: Uncovering the Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America (PM Press, 2nd ed., 2012).DeLeon, Richard Edward. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:51 am by Venkat
The court says that clarity on the standing question is forthcoming, since the Supreme Court granted cert. in Edwards v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages, heard 18 July 2013 R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors, heard 22 July 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages, heard 18 July 2013 R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors, heard 22 July 2013. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:47 am by Linda Edwards
Linda Edwards is a professor at UNLV Boyd School of Law. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am by Adam Kolber
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity"  GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents… [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 11:11 am by Tammy Binford
“Every one of these rules exercises control that moves people from independent contractor to employee,” Schickman stated. [read post]