Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 261 - 280
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm
(Eg Walsh v Shuangyan. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
For example, an ex-spouse can claim future earnings (eg see the case of Wyatt v Vince), so it is important to include a ‘clean break’ clause in any divorce settlement to prevent this potential outcome. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 1:55 am
However, it also states “the SCCs do not contain any requirement on how the signature should be formalised (eg, whether it can be done electronically). [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:53 am
The same general counsel approved an administrative directive in August to change use of force policies in ways that violate GAP policies and the Morales v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 12:26 pm
Thompson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Webpage here.It is often said of books that they contain subject-matter that is "sexy" (eg exposés of high-profile politicians) or "non-sexy" (eg bibliographies of scholarly writings on 18th century techniques of porcelain manufacture). [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:16 am
On December 22nd, the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
The United States, for example, has the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
A: We call one another up by hull number or position if hull is unknown (eg, "Warship five-nine this is Warship three-seven, over" vs "Warship in position two-one degrees two minutes north, one-five-seven degrees five-six minutes west, this is Warship three-seven four nautical miles off your port bow, over. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
The current rules envisage a “sunrise period” before the UPC formally begins to allow proprietors to opt out in advance, to prevent opt-out being frustrated by a third party filing an action (eg a revocation action) at the UPC in the meantime (which according to Art 83(3) of the UPC Agreement would prevent opt-out). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
Ct. at 3225 (citing Funk v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See, eg. the February 23, 2007, deposition of the RIAA's expert.http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp? [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
For instance the average consumer would have to ignore the clues (eg the ® symbol and “World of FunTime”) that the mark FUNTIME is used to indicate trade origin. [read post]
