Search for: "State v. Espinoza"
Results 261 - 280
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Rounding out the new offerings, the Court relisted in yet another Armed Career Criminal Act, Espinoza v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Commentary on Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:35 am
Just consider his opinion in Winter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
Comer (2017) to Carson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At the Human Rights at Home Blog, Jeremiah Ho interrogates the role of pluralism in the court’s three recent decisions expanding religious rights: Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Michael Helfand weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
By way of illustration, I will locate a document from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
Below are the top cases to watch for the remainder of the term: Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
I presume the court was holding it — perhaps for Espinoza v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
One-time relists Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:57 am
Aultman Employee Wins Harassment Claim Based in Part on Co-Workers’ Offsite Blog Posts–Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
United States, Timbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm
” Referring to the 2020 decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Espinoza, No. 05-0711 Sentence based on conviction for cocaine-related crimes is affirmed as the district court's reliance on the record before it, including the Presentence Investigation Report, constitutes an adequate basis for the sentence imposed, and the court's failure to satisfy the "open court" requirement of 18 U.S.C. section 3553(c) was not plain error. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Espinoza v. [read post]
