Search for: "State v. Greenfield" Results 261 - 280 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
As this Wired piece cleverly states, Twitter beta-tested a new feature without telling anyone: a spine. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:45 am by Mirriam Seddiq
Scott Greenfield wrote yesterday of the ABA's forward thinking task force devoted to determining something something something about Padilla v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm by Walter Olson
Minneapolis police arrest author-blogger-gun rights activist Joel Rosenberg [Popehat, Mark Bennett, Scott Greenfield] In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:10 am by Ted Frank
Scott Greenfield details the disturbing Wisconsin Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Ohio State Bar Assn., supra, at 464-465, or 564*564 commercial speech related to illegal activity, Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm by Carolyn Elefant
Contrast that kind of understanding treatment with the career-ending penalty doled out to solo Thomas Lindmeier, the Nebraska lawyer who received a six month suspension for trust accounting errors in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Scott Greenfield (Simple Justice) says that videotaping confessions may help: But it most assuredly won’t be an ironclad guarantee that false confessions won’t happen. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:27 am by Brendan Kevenides
In 1995, the Illinois Appellate Court decided this issue in People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
, though I don't know that it has any actual utility (unless Scott Greenfield's right and I'm getting a chance at secret influence on the courts). [read post]