Search for: "State v. Humbles" Results 261 - 280 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm by Morris Turek
  Unfortunately, it appears that Carefusion has not recently reviewed the Anti-Dilution Act set forth in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), which states that a “famous” mark is one that is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
In my humble opinion, the case is procedurally too premature for constitutional review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Given the state of the art, it was obvious to anyone who needed a stent of this nature that he would have to use taxol. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
American Home Products Corp., 595 S.E.2d 493, 496 (S.C. 2004).Texas: Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
As Professor Aaron Tang has observed about the justices, if "today’s justices were . . . humble, they would freely admit that sometimes, especially in the difficult cases that divide our society, they cannot find a clear answer. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:00 pm
The function took place the day after the United States Supreme Court announced its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]