Search for: "State v. K. J." Results 261 - 280 of 1,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
HIRSCH, AN EMPLOYEE OF BORDER FOODS, INC. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
This paper, which updates several key components of our January 2019 tax conformity paper,[1] examines how states have approached provisions closely tied to the competitiveness and neutrality of the tax code, including taxation of GILTI, provision of the deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), inclusion of income deemed repatriated under § 965, the first-year expensing of short-lived capital investment under § 168(k), and the § 163(j) net… [read post]
10 May 2021, 6:27 am by Jennifer Davis
Native Hawaiians, Kānaka Maoli, were a self-governing, sovereign people until July 1898 when the United States annexed the Kingdom of Hawai’i. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 25 May 2012, Tugendhat J heard the application in the case of Subotic v Knezevic. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:24 pm by robhealey
ORC 4511.19 states teh following: (j) Except as provided in division (K) of this section, the person has a concentration of any of the following controlled substances or metabolites of a controlled substance in the person’s whole blood, blood serum or plasma, or urine that equals or exceeds any of the following: (i) The person has a concentration of amphetamine in the person’s urine of at least five hundred nanograms of amphetamine per milliliter of the… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]