Search for: "State v. Sallis"
Results 261 - 280
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
Articles DeLeith Duke Gossett, The Client: How States Are Profiting from the Child’s Right to Protection, 48 U. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:49 am
At least the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in Olympia-Rabatt stated that the relevant provisions of the German Olympia Protection Act 2004 must be interpreted restrictively. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm
In Hyland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
Canada On 16 January 2023, Justice Sally Gomery dismissed an action in false arrest and defamation in the case of Goble v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
Rowling, Beyoncé, the late Mother Teresa, and the late astronaut Sally Ride. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 1:01 am
District Court, District of Columbia, stated in the 1974 ruling in Relf v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:07 am
Osha€ 174 Enforcement of Decisions of the Unified Patent Court: A Survey of Participating Member States by Christof Augenstein and Johanna Flythstrom€ 123 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:42 pm
That case, FCC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:03 pm
The Daubert standard has been adopted by nearly 40 states, but Wisconsin has thus far chastely resisted its siren song despite numerous entreaties by litigants and legislative sallies. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
On the doctrinal front, dictum in Wiener v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
As per the guidance in R v Secretary of State, chambers should identify one named clerk responsible for communicating the draft judgment from the court to the relevant barristers. [read post]
