Search for: "State v. Shepard" Results 261 - 280 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  But then last year came Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm by azatty
In United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 8:58 pm
Franklin Fitch on how, in light of Shepard v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Columbus attorney Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Classic Cases - Castano v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:14 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Fort Worth attorney Russell Cawyer of Kelly Hart & Hallman on the firm's Texas Employment Law Update Impact of Sunshine Law on physicians - Columbus lawyer Nancy Waite of Schottenstein Zox & Dunn on the firm's blog, SZD Health Law Scan Despite Dismissal, Merits of Gifford v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:37 am by Charles O'Mahony
  See also the decision in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v United States Department of Health and Human Services where in July a Federal Judge in Massachusetts ruled that legislation prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. [read post]