Search for: "State v. Wax"
Results 261 - 280
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm
Franchising will wax and wane depending on the over-all economic health of our country. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:39 am
State Farm case? [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
In GST v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Spillover of meaning may wax and wane. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
Supreme Court's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:36 am
The trial is State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
I am aware some on the other side of the Pond (and a few Europhiles on this side) love to wax fondly over copyright being a natural right, but it isn’t. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:04 pm
States are generally allowed to limit the dissemination of facts that are private in nature. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
In a timeline of self-execution, comes after Missouri v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 8:17 pm
See Juan Carlos Abella v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
The recent i4i v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Writing in the Guardian Patrick Butler pointed out that whereas the recent turnaround which saw families with disabled children being exempted was vaunted as a gesture towards decency and common sense, it was in fact the case that the government had been forced into an embarrassing climb down in the case of Gorry v Wiltshire and the Secretary of State where they fought tooth and nail to not have disabled children exempted. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
While these cases give judges a chance, as Peter Henning says, to “wax eloquent about the need for fair administration of justice under the Equal Protection Clause’s clear limit on a prosecutor’s discretion,” in the end courts have been reluctant to impose stringent requirements.Writing in the case of Newman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:05 pm
Circuit's March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:11 am
Other acts of constitutional hardball, like the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
If the Court had gone the other way, everything before 1972 would be in the public domain, from Edison's wax cylinders to the Beatles. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
” I can assure you, however, that I would have foreseen the June 19, 2017 decision in favor of The Slants in Matal v. [read post]
