Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 261 - 280 of 11,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
In particular, here is the summary of Part V, which focuses on the office issue: Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:37 am by Katherine Macfarlane
The chain of events leading to the reasonable accommodation denial in Oross v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
  The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Payam Danialypour, Oreste McClung, and Frank Goodrich and was supervised by Kimberly Frederick, Brendan McGlynn, Nikolay V. [read post]
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The major questions doctrine works best as a shorthand label for the traditional tools of statutory interpretation that Justice John Paul Stevens invoked in Chevron v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Protective letters In the case MyStromer v Revolt Zycling (UPC_CFI_177/2023) the UPC’s local division in Düsseldorf ordered a preliminary injunction, despite the fact that Revolt had filed a protective letter. [read post]
The board’s claim construction and motivation to combine analysis were supported by the record (Shamoon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Steven Calabresi (Volokh Conspiracy) and Gerard N. [read post]