Search for: "Study v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 14,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Caitlin Lentz
When selling or purchasing a medical practice, it is important to consider many legal and practical aspects, including: the form of the transaction (stock v. asset purchase); how to value the assets of the practice taking into account fair market value and commercial reasonableness; the assignability of employee contracts; compliance with state and federal medical record retention laws, regulatory laws, and other relevant federal and state laws, including STARK and the… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Caitlin Lentz
When selling or purchasing a medical practice, it is important to consider many legal and practical aspects, including: the form of the transaction (stock v. asset purchase); how to value the assets of the practice taking into account fair market value and commercial reasonableness; the assignability of employee contracts; compliance with state and federal medical record retention laws, regulatory laws, and other relevant federal and state laws, including STARK and the… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Shep Melnick, is "The Administrative State in Action: Lessons from Title IX. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm by admin
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:27 am
Abstracted in the University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 2008-40: Abstract: This article tells the story of Wickard v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]