Search for: "U. S. v. Light" Results 261 - 280 of 1,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here. in Jarmuth v Wagner    2022 NY Slip Op 33698(U)  October 28, 2022  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 161816/2019 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Elected official removed from public office for failing to be a domiciliary of the jurisdiction as required by lawBoard of Trustees of the Vil. of Sodus, N.Y. v Allen, 2011 NY Slip Op 31035(U), Supreme Court, Wayne County, Docket Number: 71473/2010, Judge Dennis M. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Baton Rouge (LA) Advocate reported yesterday on the Louisiana Supreme Court's per curiam opinion and a concurrence in Parents of Minor Child v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The obvious answer is "after joinder of issue", but the more real world answer is found in  Vlachos v Weil ;2011 NY Slip Op 50538(U) ;Decided on April 8, 2011 ;Supreme Court, Queens County ;Markey, J. . [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On appeal the USCA, Third Circuit, affirmed the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Nationwide on Fraser's wrongful termination claim but vacated and remand the state claims, and his bad-faith claim and forfeiture-for-competition claim for consideration in light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Hess v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Arе уоu having a hаrd time deciding bеtwееn thе dіffеrеnt types оf Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Sеrvісе рауmеnt agreements? [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
ShareThe humanitarian stakes were indiscernible in Monday morning’s oral argument in Sanchez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Kevin Johnson
Assuming that the 1996 amendments abrogate the Court’s holding in Rosenberg v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]