Search for: "U.S. v. Mark R" Results 261 - 280 of 3,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  Justice Alito’s extended exegesis on how the mark itself is not government speech, however, is simply nonresponsive to the Government’s argument that registration of the mark is speech by the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Stereotaxis, 429 F.3d at 1041 (“[R]egistration should be refused if the mark is descriptive of any of the goods for which registration is sought. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
Comm'r, 859 F.2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board properly determined that the marks CORN THINS and RICE THINS were highly descriptive of their respective goods—”crispbread slices predominantly of corn, namely popped corn cakes” and “crispbread slices primarily made of rice, namely rice cakes”—and that Real Foods failed to prove that the marks had acquired distinctiveness among consumers, the U.S. [read post]