Search for: "US Dep. of Justice" Results 261 - 280 of 610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2009, 3:28 pm
The United States Supreme Court held that DUI roadblocks are permissible under the federal constitution in Michigan Dep't of State Police v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:16 am
His sex crime history was well-known to Brooke's family and he was on Vermont's public sex offender registry. ..News Source.. by Brian Joyce - WCAX NewsNote: The Dep't of Justice, in a 1997 study of 73,116 offenders, reported the "Victim / Offender" relationships. see following chart created from that study (page 36).If you were to use the percentages from that chart and equated them to Vermont's figures (2,500 total on registry) then the… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:02 pm by Joseph Ashbrook
Dep’t of Justice case in 2010, the Sixth Circuit held that a party seeking an adverse inference instruction must establish that (1) the party having control of the evidence had a duty to preserve the evidence at the time it was destroyed; (2) the evidence was destroyed with a culpable state of mind; and (3) the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense such that a reasonable trier of fact could find that it would support the claim or defense. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
It does remind us, however, that New York courts have issued many decisions that seem to create a per se rule against enforcement in a termination-without-cause scenario. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
Co. of Connecticut, 2003 WL 329054 (SDNY Feb. 13, 2003).The policyholder in Phillips did not appeal Justice Siwek’s corresponding order.Matter of Pottenburgh v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf Last week the Justice Dep't asked the 9th Circuit to hold in abeyance the appeal of an earlier district court ruling invalidating Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT) while the steps to implement the policy's repeal are taken. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
As set forth in the “Toxic Justice” report, [the plaintiffs’ law firm] paid off what one of the firm’s paralegals described as “whore docs” i.e., doctors who for money eagerly attributed virtually any lung abnormality to asbestos exposure, regardless of what medical evidence actually showed. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
 But given the arguments that the Justice Dep't advances for the necessity of the MCP to many other aspects of the law, it is quite possible that the SCOTUS, if it finds the MCP invalid, would find it non-severable from at least some substantial portion of the rest of the law. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 3:07 am by SHG
UPDATE: #LASD claims my colleague @josie_huang violated 148PC – that's obstruction of justice. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
 Moreover, I also think that the Justice Dep't and  Tribe are right that any sensible use of such a distinction would put the decision not to purchase health insurance in any particular year on the activity side of the line. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:11 pm by Bill Otis
  In the federal criminal justice system, mandatory minimums are used almost exclusively for high-level drug traffickers who have trafficked in large quantities of hard drugs. [read post]