Search for: "US v. George Smith" Results 261 - 280 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Peter Smith and Robert Tuttle analyze last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Proponents: Erin Mackey, Institute for Public Representation, Georgetown Law (counsel for Consumers Union) George P. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
Lonnquest, Chief, Office of History, US Army Corps of EngineersCharles A. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, on Free Dominion, the second and third defendants had a post entitled “6 ways Baglow v Smith helped save the Internets! [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
In 2011, Justice Antonin Scalia was cited after rear-ending a vehicle on George Washington Memorial Parkway. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Smith largely repudiated the method of analysis used in prior free exercise cases like Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
Duke Power Company, per that racial radical Warren Burger, found a disparate-impact cause of action under Title VII and, more recently in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
If there was any doubt as to the meaning of “refuse” and “affect,” the Court erased it when it decided Smith v. [read post]