Search for: "US v. James Martin" Results 261 - 280 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
” In honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
James (1995), 28 C.C.L.I. (2d) 166 (S.C.J.); May v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  James Price QC for Mr Mitchell said that there was a “web of lies, deceit and indiscipline” which brought his client down. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Clayborne Carson and Tenisha Armstrong have edited The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Blake BrownProperty on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context edited by Eric Tucker, James Muir & Bruce Ziff\Broken Grounds: Criminal Law on the Aboriginal Plains, 1870-1905 by Shelley GaviganThe African-Canadians Legal Odyssey: Selected Essays edited by Barrington Walker 2011The Lazier Murder: Prince Edward County, 1884 by Robert J. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm by Bill Marler
In a 2010 Slate article (Beware the Myth of Grass-Fed Beef), James E. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
WILLIAM MARTIN, No. 13-0337 Heard at oral argument on September 18, 2014 Having recently issued an opinion about lender's rights of offset under Section 51.003 in MEHRDAD MOAYEDI v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
We thank all our readers and contributors who have supported us over the past year. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  The constitutionality of having scientists, or specially qualified judges, serve as fact finders has never been clearly addressed.[6]  Other commentators have argued in favor of the existing set of judicial tools, such as appointment of testifying “neutral” expert witnesses and scientific advisors for trial judges.[7] These approaches have been generally available in federal and some state trial courts, but they have rarely been used. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
The Polis blog has a piece by Charlie Beckett “What does the Brooks Coulson phone-hacking verdict tell us about editors’ responsibility for their newsrooms? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Martin, Fourth Circuit: After pleading guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, Appellant was sentenced to 77 months in prison. [read post]