Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
The defendant opposes the request that he undergo an HIV test on the grounds that such a test (1) violates his Constitutional rights as an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, (2) constitutes retroactive punishment and is violative of the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution; and (3) that the request was not made by the "victim" as that term is defined in… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The brief also says this:But here, there is real prejudice to the Relators if this case remains under seal or is stayed. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Russell Spivak, Adam Aliano
The Court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am by fraudfighters
On September 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
It asserts state tort claims against all the individual defendants, rather than against the United States, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm by Robert E. Connolly
  Virtually every international cartel case involves foreign citizens being indicted (some under seal) and remaining fugitives. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" … The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit provides [under the James v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am by Eric Segall
 1) The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment only applies to state action. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Do they hold a "Public Trust under the United States"? [read post]