Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" This is similar to the standard offered by Jeff Wall, who argued for the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Michael Lowe
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:24 pm by Bryce Chadwick
The United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently issued a decision unsealing a False Claims Act case over the objections of the government, the relator and the defendant.[1] In United States ex. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:36 pm by A. Brian Albritton
”The government contended that 31 USC 3730(b)(1) “allows a realtor to maintain the non-intervened portion of the actionin the name of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
§1605 (a)(2) reads: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case … in which the action is based [1] upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or [2] upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or [3] upon an… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
FOIA/Government Transparency The Stranger Unsealing Case: The United States government routinely asks courts for electronic surveillance warrants and other orders under seal. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am by Leandra Lederman
In the Tax Court context, at the time I wrote my 1998 article, legislation already required public access to all Tax Court opinions and case files that weren’t under seal. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:08 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As we previously reported, the fate of the DACA program now rests in Judge Hanen’s hands, who is currently presiding over a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas along with seven other states (State of Texas, et al., v. the United States of America, et al.). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
" They were "disrespecting" him, making comments, and threatening comments under their breath. [read post]