Search for: "United States v. Bernstein" Results 261 - 280 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm by Ray Dowd
Unfortunately, in the United States, the field of art history is largely a sham - and the lack of academic attention to provenance is endemic. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm by Ilya Somin
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
For her first affirmative defense and objection, Irene asserted that the prenuptial agreement was defective, invalid, and unenforceable pursuant to the 2013 New York Court of Appeals decision in Galetta v Galetta, 21 N.Y.3d 186, because the acknowledgments omitted language expressly stating that the notaries knew the signers or had ascertained, through some sort of proof, that the signers were the persons described as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, November 8, 2019 Tags: Audits, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Cryptocurrency, ICOs, SEC, SEC enforcement, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Small firms, Transfer agents Company Hedging Policies: Observations from New Proxy Disclosures Posted by David Gordon, Dina Bernstein, and Andrew R. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Judge Irving Kaufman almost sounded weary by the third opinion in the sequence, Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
It was my word against that of the President of the United States, who was corroborated by former attorney general John Mitchell, former assistant to the president John Ehrlichman, and former assistant to the pre [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Over Federal Restrictions Legal Times Gun rights advocates have filed a new lawsuit in Washington, D.C., federal court, this time seeking to make it possible for American expats to buy guns when they're back home in the United States. [read post]