Search for: "United States v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF I. & N."
Results 261 - 280
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
The Immigration and Nationality Act does not require exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing an APA action in Federal District Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Malooly responded recently “[i]n the spirit of truth” he didn’t know about the abuser until 1992. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
State Land Use Comm’n (9th Cir. 2020) 950 F.3d 610. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(Patently-O) New federal bill seeks to ban tax planning strategy patents (IP Spotlight) Is this the next Director of the USPTO talking? [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Lazarus was also the founding director of Georgetown Law’s Supreme Court Institute and has argued 14 cases in the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
State Land Use Comm’n (9th Cir. 2020) 950 F.3d 610. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
This hack led to a putative class action complaint being filed against OPM and others in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in late June, 2015.[6] As in the customer cases discussed above, the gravamen of the employee complaint against OPM is inaction. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(Ip's What's Up) Africa New US Trade Representative - Afro implications (Afro-IP) Argentina Official collective management organisation for film directors (IP tango) Asia An Asian perspective on the credit crunch (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Scotch Whisky Association seeks leave to appeal FCA decision to the Supreme Court in trade mark battle over GLEN (Excess Copyright) China Third revision of China’s… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm
In addition, on September 25, 2015, plaintiff’s lawyers filed a securities class lawsuit in the Eastern District of Virginia against VW, its U.S. operating divisions, and certain of its directors and officers, on behalf of investors who purchased VW’s American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
In refusing Netflix’s application to have the case thrown out, a Californian Central District Court judge said that there was no evidence of “precluding defamation claims for the portrayal of real persons in otherwise fictional works. [read post]
