Search for: "United States v. General Electric Company" Results 261 - 280 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  While it is true that there was a ban on asbestos put in place in the 1970s, that ban was later overturned by the United States Supreme Court on grounds that it was enacted without constitutional authority to do so, and there were goods being made with asbestos in the early 1980s. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
” Another potential consequence would be ISIS turning to “less conventional military tactics” and inspiring attacks elsewhere including Europe and the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Morgan, the following text is curious:By 1897, General Electric was the undisputed leader, and Westinghouse was its only serious rival. n152 The two companies agreed to a truce in the form of patent cross-licensing and product pricing agreements. n153 Smaller competitors were invited to join [*1931] the Incandescent Lamp Manufacturers Association, organized by General Electric. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm by Elina Saxena
” A top U.S. general in Iraq said that, either way, those brigades could require U.S. support. [read post]
EPA also cannot require electricity generation to be shifted from coal-burning units to units that use other energy sources as a pollution control technology. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Liskow & Lewis
EPA also cannot require electricity generation to be shifted from coal-burning units to units that use other energy sources as a pollution control technology. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Environmental Protection Agency’s “Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units,” 80 Fed. [read post]