Search for: "United States v. International Business MacHines" Results 261 - 280 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
It accused the Prince of controlling images of his children through the “Palace spin machine”, a claim that has been echoed elsewhere. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Ambiguities 1798.105(d)(7) allows a business to reject a deletion request to “enable solely internal uses that are reasonably aligned with the expectations of the consumer based on the consumer’s relationship with the business. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
Many people excluded from the United States because of the Muslim ban, such as those who received a once-in-a-lifetime immigration visa via the “diversity lottery,” have still not been admitted. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Patent Baristas) Bilski – Federal Circuit clarifies test for business method patents (Managing Intellectual Property) Adding inventor to issued patent requires corroborating evidence: Tavory v NTP (IP Spotlight) (Law360) Egyptian Goddess puts teeth back in US industrial design rights (Intellectual Property Watch) US Paten [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Adjudicating by Algorithm, Regulating by Robot May 22, 2017 | Cary Coglianese and David Lehr Sophisticated computational techniques, known as machine-learning algorithms, increasingly underpin advances in business practices. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Adjudicating by Algorithm, Regulating by Robot May 22, 2017 | Cary Coglianese and David Lehr Sophisticated computational techniques, known as machine-learning algorithms, increasingly underpin advances in business practices. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Spicy IP)   Events 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 13-14 June: Centre for European Economic Research conference on ‘The… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the case the United States filed an amicus brief noting all of that and arguing in favor of Ms. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Commission’s faith in machines or algorithms as arbiters of fundamental rights is not shared by technical experts. [read post]