Search for: "United States v. Lucas" Results 261 - 280 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am by Russell Knight
Evid. 609 Impeachment For Bias In An Illinois Divorce Hearing Or Trial “The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution (U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Instead, according to the court, The United States Supreme Court has never held that rape-shield statutes do not represent a legitimate state interest, nor has it ever held that highly probative evidence will necessarily outweigh that interest. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
An expert from Vermont, which in 2000 became thefirst jurisdiction in the United States to enact a civil union law, testified that civil union couplesthere still face problems with the law today. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
(Case No. 07-1853cv), the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a Bankruptcy Code Provision [11 U.S.C. sec. 526(a)(4)] did not violate the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of attorney Zenas Zelotes. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
In 1999, 98 people were executed in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Barrett was a member of a panel affirming by unpublished opinion an appeal brought by a Native prisoner in Wisconsin state prison, Schlemm v Carr. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:17 pm by rnahoum
The Problem In recent years, due in part to the financial crisis and high rates of unemployment caused by Wall Street shenanigans, the United States has been in a foreclosure crisis. [read post]