Search for: "United States v. Newman"
Results 261 - 280
of 659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm
United States, which seeks review of an interesting takings case out of the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:05 am
In Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:40 pm
STC.UNM v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
[The Board granted a petition to cancel five registrations for the marks EDGE, THE EDGE, GAMER'S EDGE, and CUTTING EDGE for video games, printed matter, and related goods and services, in view of a final judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Edge Games, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
United States Patent Nos. 5,715,314, 5,909,492, and 7,272,639. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Mayo Collaborative will look at how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:23 am
Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:15 am
Equal pay for equal workBertoldi v State of New York, 275 AD2d 227; Motion to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 706; Motion to appeal on constitutional grounds denied, 95 NY2d 958Section 115 of the Civil Service Law provides that State employees are entitled to equal pay for equal work, and regular increases in pay in proper proportion to increase of ability, increase of output and increase of equality of work demonstrated in service.While Section 115 applies only to employees of the… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:23 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, decided SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
United. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:09 am
In 1996, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued joint guidance in their Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The qui tam cases are captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
