Search for: "United States v. State of Minn."
Results 261 - 280
of 764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
Casimir of Wells, 243 Minn. 289, 67 N.W.2d 644 (Minnesota Supreme Court 1954). [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:44 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
See New York et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
However, if the hypothetical alien had been walking in Toledo and the Government could prove that he was an enemy spy who had been inside enemy lines fighting against the United States, and then sneaked into the United States as a spy, he would be like the aliens whom the Government captured in Ex parte Quirin. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
We also know that the President (the chief law enforcement officer of the United States) announced last February that there has not been a “smidgen of corruption” even though neither he nor the Department of Justice could have examined all the evidence, in particular the emails and other electronic information. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Shippman, 86 N.W. 431, 445 (Minn. 1901) (emphasis added); see also State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
Just six days after our article, Luis Aguilar, a Commissioner of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), stated very clearly in a speech entitled “Cyber Risks in the Boardroom,”[ii] that, [B]oards must take seriously their responsibility to ensure that management has implemented effective risk management protocols. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
Gessert (Minn. 1875)). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:46 am
United States, (U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
