Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 5:30 am
Over the next week, Cybercrime Review will feature a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
For all those mystified by the Supreme Court’s personal jurisdiction jurisprudence, I recommend checking out the South Carolina Law Review’s symposium on the Court’s recent decisions in Goodyear Dunlop Tires v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
Fort Sumter Tours Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – February 1st, 2016 – This case involves a personal injury, which occurred when the Plaintiff was on board a ship owned by the Defendant. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina ordered defendant Bright Builders, Inc. to pay $770,750.00 in damages for contributory trademark infringement as the result of a jury verdict against it for constructing and providing web hosting services to a company it knew to be infringing on third parties’ trademarks. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm
[6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,… [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
However, late yesterday afternoon, in another case challenging the rule, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina struck down the rule in its entirety. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:22 am
Carolina Care Plan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
The South Carolina Law Review publishes a symposium issue on (U.S.) [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Carroll v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:45 am
In particular, two recent federal cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:30 am
South Carolina recognizes the rule established by the United States Supreme Court that courts, and not arbitrators, will consider "threshold" questions of "arbitrability" unless there is "clea[r] and unmistakabl[e] evidence" that the parties intended otherwise. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:43 pm
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
