Search for: "United States v. Treasury Employees" Results 261 - 280 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm by D. Daxton White
Look at Apple, Apple has a huge market share in the United States where are they going to grow, they want to grow by capturing the middle class that’s coming out in China right now and selling them iPhones. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Board of Education of Township High School District 205, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), and United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
If this is true, I would like to offer $5 per firm for options just like those that high-end IP firms grant to their star employees.(2) As no doubt was expected, the Treasury stuck to its guns in the final regulations. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am by Jennifer Canfield
Only July 8, 2015, the National Treasury Employees Union filed the second class action against (now former) OPM Director Archuleta stemming from the massive OPM data breach. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
  The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ACA provides that territories of the United States (e.g., Guam) are “States,” for purposes of this law. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
“General personal representative” excludes special administrator. (36) “Petition” means a written request to the court for an order after notice.(37) “Proceeding” includes action at law and suit in equity.(38) “Property” includes both real and personal property or any interest therein and means anything that may be the subject of ownership.(39) “Protected person” is as defined in Section 5-102.(40) “Protective proceeding” means… [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A recent case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Stine, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
A few of those are as follows: In the closely watched matter of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court’s landmark decisions regarding same-sex marriage in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am by SHG
S. 378, 384 (1987); United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Tammy Binford
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]