Search for: "Unknown Doe 1"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 8:39 am
Conclusion: 1. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:23 pm
However, Federal law does require the card to have some distinguishable letters. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
And, blaming some unknown "someone" for the copying is the old "the grad student did it" defense, which usually does not work.Without reaching the issue of whether copying one sentence from the Washington Post was plagiarism, one notes the minimal discussion of Hamlet's bigger "sin," the deliberate and knowing bolstering of his accomplishments on the resume. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:03 am
While the USPTO does use the term trademark to denote businesses offering goods or services, there is a distinction between a trademark and a service mark. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:52 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, associate, corporate or otherwise of Defendants Does 1 to 100 inclusive and each of them are unknown to Plaintiffs at this time who, therefore, sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am
” What we have is a “known unknown”: we know that we do not know the answer. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§160.306.The physician-patient privilege was "unknown to the common law," and where created by statute "is subject to many exceptions and to waiver for many reasons. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:00 am
By this I mean that you can’t serve process via email if (1) the defendant is in a Hague Service Convention state; (2) the defendant’s address is known (such that the Convention applies); and (3) the law of the destination state does not provide for service by email so as to bring Article 19 into play. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
What is unknown cannot "anticipate. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
Axway, Inc., et. al., 6-10-cv-00011 (TXED December 1, 2011, Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 5:33 am
Therefore, Ciralsky does not state a valid Fourth Amendment claim. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:54 am
The Court does not credit Defendant’s attempts to refute this testimony based on the short distance to the kitchen. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:47 am
Moreover, upon the testimony at the re-opened hearing, Detective Brown’s July 29, 2009 narrative entry does not negate the truth underlying the Court’s fundamental conclusion that all the affidavits and warrants were executed on July 24, 2009. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
(a) The appellant does not say why the Examining Division’s view that the method claim 1 is anticipated by D1 was wrong, let alone take issue with its analysis demonstrating that all the features of claim 1 are to be found in D1. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 1:48 pm
While it would seem logical to do so, whether NTIA will attempt to stand up the middle-mile program in a similar timeframe as the BEAD last-mile broadband program is unknown. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Idiopathic – arising spontaneously or from an obscure or unknown cause. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
The suit has also named several Jane Does as defendants, a legal tactic commonly used as a placeholder when the identities of defendants are unknown. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Also the appellants submitted that due to a “release” of the activity of the original substance to the diluent during the multiple dilutions, the diluent of the dilutions referred to in claim 1 has properties which the undiluted diluent does not have. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
§ 20-1-119 did not apply because Sunbeam was not an “unknown entity” to the Townes when Manchester named Sunbeam as a comparative tortfeasor in its answer. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 3:16 am
Is Article 12(1)(a) of the E-Commerce Directive to be interpreted as meaning that in the circumstances of present case, Article 14(1)(b) applies mutatis mutandis to an injunction? [read post]
