Search for: "WEISS v. WEISS" Results 261 - 280 of 1,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 7:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Election Infrastructure | In EPIC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830; Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 159 AD3d 683, 684). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Michael Risch of the Written Description Blog shares his opinion on the subject and with a view to the ongoing Oracle v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Without significant power they become more like a shareholder and their interest may be viewed as a security.The line between the two types of partnerships when considering the question of if a security is involved can be assessed by considering three factors set forth in Williamson v Tucker, 645 F. 2d 404 (5th Cir. 1981). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ABA Journal, Debra Cassens Weiss looks at “an analysis of nearly 3,000 hours of oral arguments for more than a 30-year period” suggesting that the “[v]ocal pitch of U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Juror Comprehension of Complex Cases Jennifer Weiss, a law student from St. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am by SHG
The reason for making the allegation is obvious, as Elliot is likely a public figure and thus held to allege actual malice under Times v. [read post]