Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Matter of" Results 261 - 280 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning to DSW’s argument that the employee failed to mitigate damages, the court found that she put forth compelling facts tending to show that she conducted a thorough job search from 2009 through 2012, worked at Wal-Mart at a lower paying job for a while, and again conducted a thorough job search after she left Wal-Mart. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolWhen the much anticipated decision is Wal-Mart Stores Inc v Dukes.pdf was announced (see our post analyzing of the decision), many commentators, us included, believed it would significantly change the landscape of employment class actions. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:05 pm by The Complex Litigator
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc), the trial court applied essentially identical standards and correctly decided the issue. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
Penney, Kmart, Meijer, Sears (SHLD, Fortune 500), USA Baby, and Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) stores and online at Amazon.com (AMZN, Fortune 500), Babiesrus.com, Costco.com, Target.com (TGT, Fortune 500), and Walmart.com from January 1993 through October 2009. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:28 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Additionally, the decision, known as “Whirlpool II”, represents some pushback with respect to another relatively recent Supreme Court decision thought to spell trouble for the future of class actions, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 18, 2015 Injuries at Amusement Parks in Florida, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 10, 2015     [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
The judge said that Wal-Mart's plan, which requires that non-custodial stepchildren live with Wal-Mart employees at least nine months out of the year and that they be claimed on their parents' federal tax returns as dependents to qualify for coverage, runs counter to New York law. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Employers could face sizeable punitive damage awards on top of the wages due for break violations, since the primary argument relied upon (i.e., in the Wal-Mart case) was that one could not recover punitive damages for failure to pay a penalty. [read post]