Search for: "Watt v. Watt" Results 261 - 280 of 808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2007, 4:38 am
Medimmune v GenentechThe IPKat's friends, nobly led by Edward Tomlinson (Frohwitter, Munich), have drawn his attention to the US Supreme Court [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
In striking down defendant’s affirmative defense based on § 303.390 RSMo., the trial court applied Watts v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
In striking down defendant’s affirmative defense based on § 303.390 RSMo., the trial court applied Watts v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
But I would not close the courthouse door to an insurance company that is willing and able to do so.In Andrew Lee Watts v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The second, by Walter Alexander Bailey, shows the former Watts Mill.A judge will address the group about landmark cases, likely including the Swope Park pool desegregation case, Williams v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
Oklahoma is probably the least likely state one would imagine to be the epicenter of workers' compensation controversy, but since the state did a "reform" which drastically altered some qualification for benefits as well as introducing an opt-out program, the state has been embroiled in dispute.Last week, of course, the state's Workers' Compensation Commission declared opt-out to be unconstitutional, failing the state's guarantee of equal protection.The commission said… [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
As noted in prior posts here and here and here, the Sixth Circuit is currently considering en banc review of the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement after Booker in the wake of a panel's notable per curiam ruling in US v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:37 am by Bill Otis
Among the cases to which cert was denied today was a very big sentencing case, Jones v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
The Court explained that whilea per se (nine-month) bar does not apply, a significantly lengthy period is a factor to be considered, with "proportionally heightened scrutiny" given to whether the People's inability to provide more precise times can be justified as against the important notice rights of the defendant (People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 539; People v Watt, 81 NY2d 772, 775).At trial, the victim testified that the two incidents occurred about two… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
The date of a judgment entered prior to July 1, 2015 is computed in accordance with the Rules in effect when the judgment was entered.Turning next to relevant caselaw, the court cited its prior discussion (in Hiob v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ilesanmi, Sexual offences in a Muslim world: a socio-ethical reflection on Zamfara State (Nigeria) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:58 am
In the recent, unpublished decision of Watts v. [read post]