Search for: "Wells v. CIR" Results 261 - 280 of 14,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 1:43 pm
Both opinions are extremely well-written as well as substantively great. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
  Because your identity may well be disclosed.You're essentially at the whim of the government (and the Ninth Circuit), and they'll decide whether the target of your ire -- the entity that's (allegedly) engaging in a crime -- gets to find out who you are under the FOIA. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Poole Chemical Co., 419 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2005), we are unpersuaded by its reasoning. . ." [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2002), or the Second Circuit in Desiano v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 7:33 am
Fifteen informed, incredibly well-educated judges, each of whom reads -- and the majority of whom sign onto -- the majority en banc opinion. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 12:16 pm
Both as a matter of style as well as a matter of substance.I am incredibly impressed. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
So, for example, in the Central District of California, we regularly see opinions in cases coming from the "Los Angeles District Court" as well as the "Santa Ana District Court. [read post]