Search for: "Westchester County v. County of Westchester"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the Appellate Division said that under the circumstances, the arbitrator's imposing the penalty of termination did not shock its sense of fairness. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the Appellate Division said that the arbitration award, which imposed a penalty of a $10,000 fine upon petitioner was not "so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:05 am
The 89-page complaint (full text) in Preserve Hudson Valley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the Appellate Division said that under the circumstances, the arbitrator's imposing the penalty of termination did not shock its sense of fairness. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, said that u under the circumstances presented the termination of the individual's employment “was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:56 am
A Manhattan Judicial Hearing Officer recently ruled in People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:22 am
Westchester County, issued on June 30. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
That case is People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
County Court of Kings County, Sup., 129 N.Y.S.2d 109; Matter of Zivin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
Edward Wasik v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Accepting Nassau's construction of the Ordinance would render the provisions concerning an employee's "initial employment date" superfluous and, citing Universal Metal & Ore, Inc. v Westchester County Solid Waste Commission, 145 AD3d 46, said "[C]ourts must give effect to the wording of a statute without rejecting any words as superfluous, and must harmonize related provisions in a way that renders them compatible;"c. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:32 pm
In Siegfried v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Sanctions ordered after lawsuit filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ruled frivolousMatter of Fenstermaker v Edgemont Union Free School Dist., 2006 NY Slip Op 52652(U), Decided on September 26, 2006, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Loehr, J. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:26 am
Drafting disciplinary charges Fella v County of Rockland, App. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Jeanette Turner v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
Well, People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Hell, Brown v. [read post]
