Search for: "Young v. Long"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:14 am
The post Indiana becomes first state since Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
The EEOC's interpretation of the PDA, ADA, and Title VII are not 100% binding (we may find that out sooner rather than later with Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
Long of San Antonio as TYLA chair. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
The Court ruled 6-3 on March 25 in Young v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:34 am
In Iopa v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Merpel remains puzzled as to why it takes so long for the nation's top court to give its rulings. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:20 am
I attended the oral arguments on March 31 in the Kimble v Marvel case, in which the Court considers whether to overrule Brulotte v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
It is also the latest development in a long running saga concerning criminal record checks and an individual’s ability, and indeed right, to put the past behind them. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:06 am
In the case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
It was a long wait for Steve which can be explained by some of the lessons learned below. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:38 am
In one recent Long Island case, People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
She says she was 15 when Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:53 am
I won today in State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:25 pm
View the article hereAnother rather famous person getting a slap on the wrist, while the average citizen would be in prison for a long time. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
It is interesting that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Allen did not even mention Ex Parte Young, which makes one wonder whether some of the justices might be reconsidering this long-established exception to state sovereign immunity. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
S. 43, 67 (internal quotation marks omitted), but a case does not become moot as “long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small,” in the litigation’s outcome, Chafin v. [read post]
