Search for: "ABOVE THE LAW AND LATERAL LINK"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 6:23 am
Not so the remaining board member, Victor Gonzalez. who gained his broad seat recently, only because the New York State legislature, extremely belatedly, enacted a law allowing residents to be on public housing boards: Lifelong New Yorker, NYCHA resident and board member Victor Gonzalez Mr. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Quoting from his own earlier decision this year (see link above), he states in a footnote to this decision "[a]s we indicated in In re Marriage of Greenberg (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1095) the trial court's comment on grandmother's veracity is tantamount to an "adverse factual finding. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:34 am
I won’t re-post their article in its entirety, to read the whole thing you’ll need to click on the link above. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
Following established jurisprudence, that for an invention to be sufficiently disclosed if the disclosure is reproducible without undue burden, see the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 6th Edition, 2010, II.A.4.2 and the case law cited therein, e.g. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
Go to the link above, or read on, and watch as people are arrested for citing the constitution! [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Barnabus that BMA had sued SG and LA, and shared links to newspaper reports which contained negative information about SG and LA. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Quoting from his own earlier decision this year (see link above), he states in a footnote to this decision "[a]s we indicated in In re Marriage of Greenberg (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1095) the trial court's comment on grandmother's veracity is tantamount to an "adverse factual finding. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
That’s “well above existing legal and regulatory requirements,” Ben Chance, chief fraud risk officer at EWS, told Reuters. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Ultimately VHC undertook the work on Building A, with Crown Royal later alleging that VHC did so without King's consent whereas Ocean Suffolk contended that the two managers agreed to hire VHC when there were no bona fide third-party bids. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Those who didn’t fear that it was now or never for the marshmallow, who were confident that two marshmallows would appear later, were more willing to wait. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 1:47 pm
Conscious starts from the no-thing (Broekman, supra chp. 1and my discussion above); “With it, an existential totality is evoked, a world of action and resistance in need of being articulated as ‘some-thing. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
A report from the medical examiner later found 12-inch-long chemical burns on Diaz's arms. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:29 am
The additional aid, which could be announced later this week, is expected to include artillery to help Ukraine in its fight against Russian forces. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Failure to object at trial either waives the error (prohibiting later relief) or forfeits the error (permitting relief only after increased scrutiny). [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
First, the AS investigation has been initiated “ex-officio”, and not further to domestic industry’s complaint, which is a rather rare instance (although, in our view, this may be linked to preserving the confidentiality of some EU actors, due to retaliation concerns, which have been previously encountered in trade defense procedures). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
To exact an obligation to warn the user of unknown and unknowable allergies, sensitivities and idiosyncrasies would be for the courts to recast the manufacturer in the role of an insurer beyond any reasonable application of the rationale expressed above. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
It later became a successful TV series, and finally a movie in 2005. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
It later became a successful TV series, and finally a movie in 2005. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
This type of harm cannot be redressed by monetary damages available at law. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
Nothing in section 315(c), however,estops the requester from challenging at a later time thevalidity of a claim that was not previously requestedpursuant to section 311 and reexamined pursuant tosection 313.Separately:We also find no basis in the statute for Affinity’s argumentthat the final decision in the Volkswagen litigationshould have preclusive effect on the reexaminationsrequested by King or Apple. [read post]
