Search for: "Antonin Scalia" Results 2781 - 2800 of 6,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Rich McHugh
As an interesting historical note, this decision was one of two decisions issued by the Court on its first day of rulings after the tragic death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:49 pm by Cynthia Pittson
The vacancy on the Court created by the death of Antonin Scalia means that President Obama is constitutionally obligated to appoint a successor. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:10 am by Michael Gerhardt
Scalia’s seat is still vacant, and the law creating it remains in full force. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:33 am by David Markus
Senate, could become the Supreme Court's first Cuban-American justice if nominated by President Barack Obama and approved once again.Jordan, 54, is one of a number of potential nominees to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
The battle over a possible successor to Justice Antonin Scalia continues to dominate the news. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:22 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Yesterday, the U.S. military announced that it had successfully targeted and killed over 150 al Shabaab militants in Somalia in a series of airstrikes against a training camp. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am by Andrew Hamm
This blog recently featured a series of posts from former law clerks of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
Coverage relating to the battle over Justice Antonin Scalia’s successor comes from CNN, where Matthew Jaffe reports that “[f]ormer Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott says he would have taken up President Obama’s nomination to fill the seat of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Rossum, Claremont McKenna College, has published Antonin Scalia's Jurisprudence: Text and Tradition (University Press of Kansas, 2016). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:10 am by David Markus
Biden’s remarks hit on the historic stakes facing the president as he ponders his choice to succeed Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month, leaving Mr. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:58 am by Kent Scheidegger
Lee Liberman Otis has this post at SCOTUSblog with the above title, noting how her constitutional law professor, Antonin Scalia, had a view of the Marbury case different from what is usually taught in law school. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 85 [week ending on Sunday 28February] – AG Yves Bot's take in Reha Training | Battistelli having hard times | Blocking injunctions in trade mark cases | AIPPI UK event | Patent Enforcement Worldwide| Why Mickey Mouse is not mickey mouse | UPC court fees.Never too late 84 [week ending on Sunday 21 February] – Domain Name Law and Practice | Unwired Planet v Huawei and Samsung | In… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" Chief Justice John Roberts joined the majority decision, as did Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am by John Floyd
  This was made clear by the late Justice Antonin Scalia who firmly believed that Bush v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 1:02 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El juez del Tribunal Supremo Antonin Scalia dijo que ‘Un impuesto sobre los yarmulkes, es un impuesto sobre los judíos, pues un impuesto sobre los tampones y toallas sanitarias, es un impuesto sobre las mujeres'”, lee la demanda. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 2:02 pm by Bill Otis
 As for the further notion that, as smart and even-handed as she may be (or may not be), she would come close to filling the shoes of an intellectual giant like Antonin Scalia.....well....hello! [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 7:16 am by Nicole Reustle
” That’s why legal scholars across the political spectrum have warned that a constitutional convention would be “an invitation to constitutional mayhem,” (from the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Harvard Law’s Lawrence Tribe). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:14 am by David Post
Personally, I find Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent (joined by Justices John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy) pretty persuasive; this looks a lot more like private speech to me, and the government has an obligation to be neutral between competing expressions: The Court holds that all the privately created messages on the many specialty plates issued by the State of Texas convey a government message rather than the message of the motorist displaying the plate. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:55 pm by Mark Tushnet
," Justice Scalia might have exclaimed, as he did about Footnote Four in Carolene Products [I'm paraphrasing his comment]) in Overton Park, saying that because the legislative history is ambiguous, "it is clear that we must look primarily to the statutes themselves to find the legislative intent. [read post]