Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
In that case, the applicant was seeking registration of the mark ROMANOV for decorative eggs, porcelain boxes, jewelry, and picture frames. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
Facebook and Cohen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
The court analyzed the case Fraley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
In its recent decision in Limelight Networks Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
Floyd sought her concealed carry permit, and the application included a box that asked “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana? [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
The key reasoning of the new decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
San Francisco Beautiful v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm
’s ban on handguns (Heller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
" Clare et al v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm
Melody Evans won recently in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Stecklow checked the box indicating that he was married. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
If such a defense is found to be warranted, a court may grant a party an adverse inference jury instruction at trial stating that the jury may infer from the opposing party's failure to preserve the black box information that such information would have been adverse to that party's position. [read post]
