Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 6:11 am
.): 25 Greenwoods Motion for Summary J + Tribal Appellate Court Decision 27 State Farm Motion for Summary J 27-1 Tribal Court Complaint 27-3 State Farm Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss 37 Greenwood Response 38 State Farm Response 39 State Farm Reply 42 MJ Order An excerpt: In summary, the court concludes that the tribal court does have jurisdiction over the Greenwoods’ claims against State Farm. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:59 pm
., New York City Transit Authority, City of New York, NYC MTA, LaGuardia Airport Administration, Amy Caggiula, Does 1-1000, Case No. 1:14 CV 2755 (S.D.N.Y. filed 4/11/2014). [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The second relates to Article 4(1)(c) which concerns the ‘use of equipment situated on the territory of the said Member State’. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:56 am
The appellate court concluded that the “complaint does not plead sufficient facts to establish reasonable probability as opposed to possibility, of liability in the underlying case. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:14 pm
While it is fairly uncommon that an appeals court throws out a conviction, it does happen as evidenced in this case. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:13 am
And does some bill have to “win” and move on to become a law? [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:42 am
Scheme to defraud in the first degree requires that the defendant actually `obtain[ ] property from one or more . . . persons,’ [New York] Penal Law § 190.65(1)(a), while wire fraud does not. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
The first concerned infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark, which reads'In proceedings before it the Office shall examine the facts of its own motion; however, in proceedings relating to relative grounds for refusal of registration, the Office shall be restricted in this examination to the facts, evidence and arguments provided by the parties and the relief sought'.In a nutshell, the Court stated that the Board of Appeal had correctly… [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:13 am
National Trust (1990), 38 C.L.R. 106, the mortgagee assured a subcontractor that it would be paid if it continued to work on the project, even though the contractor was in serious financial condition. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:36 am
What does “average” mean here? [read post]
3 May 2014, 9:48 am
” (The link is to the 2014 revision, which appears to contain the same relevant text (see p. 38) at issue in Sarrazin.) [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:57 am
How does it compare to previous years? [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 am
If authorized by contract, the parties may agree on the standard that will govern the attorney's fee award, even if that standard conflicts with Chapter 38 of the Texas Practice and Remedies Code. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
What does success look like? [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:08 pm
Section 113 does not apply in respect of a determination issued under section 119. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
This doctor, a general gynecologist, does not treat cervical cancer patients. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
(dkt.# 90) 36:17–38:4.) [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
I discount the figures claimed the items 1 to 16 (except item 6) by 25%. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
I discount the figures claimed the items 1 to 16 (except item 6) by 25%. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:06 pm
How does TCE get into the water supply? [read post]
