Search for: "Harris v. State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 5,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
Many states (estimates are as high as 30) will make abortions illegal the minute Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
Carnes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
” Harris v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
Likewise, the Court was not persuaded by Gunter’s argument that Cadle Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Harris’ claims. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:14 am
Justice Marzari stated that Mr. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:56 am
Harris, No. 14-15978 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
Kennedy authored the second, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:34 am
That lawsuit became known as O’Donnell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm
However, the court’s decision in Dickerson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
They contended that the state court’s decision is inconsistent with Caldwell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 3:28 pm
Instead it stated that "the present case involves a central issue of federal constitutional law, and although we abstain from ruling on issues of Texas constitutional law, see Railroad Commission v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
"[18] The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19] Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:23 am
(Bowen v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
In that case, the Supreme Court held that President Harry Truman could not seize the steel mills during the Korean War when a nationwide strike closed down the steel industry. [read post]
