Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 40,607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Dixon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Yet no less important to include is evidence large bipartisan majorities of Americans who want to protect the voting rights with legislated improvements to facilitate early voting and reduce voting restrictions.[14] Supermajorities of both parties want independent commission to determine the map of legislative districts rather than partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
For example, a few journalists completely blew NFIB v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:03 am
This would include large chains such as Boots or Superdrug. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:03 am
Image from D.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 5:23 pm
Castro, this has to be seen as a significant defeat for Mayor Vince Lago, who organized a slate and large sums of money to support it in a losing effort for Groups IV and V. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:39 pm
In other words, it would create significant red tape and compliance costs in an attempt to address an issue that is mostly peripheral to the stated aims, and arguably already dealt with by EU courts in Huawei v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:33 am
In the first major Massachusetts decision to address the fallout from Bruen, the Supreme Judicial Court held in Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition on… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:51 pm
Let’s start off with what I consider to be the “good” proposals: The Good 314(a) – Codify Apple v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:36 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Instead, civic education is largely optional and highly susceptible to shifting political tides and priorities at the federal, state, and local levels. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
With the 30th anniversary of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) on the horizon, the Third Circuit’s recent precedential opinion in Scott v. [read post]
