Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm
Updated | Bailey & Others v London Borough of Brent Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin) – Read judgment Every Wednesday my daughter looks forward to the arrival of the mobile library at her nursery. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:06 pm
Samsung v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:16 pm
Roe v Wade [legalizing abortion] was another ... [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:02 am
He arrived wearing a black hooded cape and mask of a type featured in a British film about a pro-democracy activist of the near-future, V For Vendetta. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:57 am
Gateway Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Mortimer Off Shore Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
We might likewise doubt the 50 Acres court’s invocation of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:11 am
One of the types of resources that CRL collects are dissertations from countries outside the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:11 am
One of the types of resources that CRL collects are dissertations from countries outside the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
We have previously covered the changes to housing benefit (HB) introduced by the Con-Dems and the DCLG’s concerns over them as well as those of certain London boroughs. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
We have previously covered the changes to housing benefit (HB) introduced by the Con-Dems and the DCLG’s concerns over them as well as those of certain London boroughs. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Mr Justice Silber then considered the case law and relied on Lana v Positive Action Training Housing (London) [2001] IRLR 501 which states that the test of authority is whether when doing a discriminatory act the discriminator was exercising authority conferred by the Principal, and not whether the Principal had authorised the agents to discriminate. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:20 am
Blaisdell, which reduced the Contracts Clause to a practical nullity; Kelo v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
If parties are no longer free to do so under English law, then as Laurence Rabinowitz QC (for the London Court of International Arbitration, intervening) put it, the risk of a “chilling effect” on arbitration in London would be substantial. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
If parties are no longer free to do so under English law, then as Laurence Rabinowitz QC (for the London Court of International Arbitration, intervening) put it, the risk of a “chilling effect” on arbitration in London would be substantial. [read post]
