Search for: "MRS v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 21,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The conclusion of the en banc CAFC: For the reasons stated herein, the district court abused its discretion in excluding Mr. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am by NL
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am by NL
LB Lambeth v Emeter [2010] EWCA Civ 527 [not on Baili, note from a transcript] This was a renewed permission to appeal hearing which foundered on Mr Emeter's complete lack of Agatha Christie-esque skills in plotting, detail and making evidence ambiguous. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:15 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision February 21, 2013 Order of Public CensureCase Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:46 am by WSLL
The State responded, asserting among other claims, that Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm by Federal and Extradition Defense
The California Supreme Court reinstated the conviction of defendant State v Herrera, in spite of the admission of preliminary hearing testimony of a witness deported to El Salvador. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
In MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) [Our report], we saw the Upper Tribunal accept the DWP argument on the position of ‘shared care’ families for bedroom tax purposes. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Libby Payne, Olswang LLP
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]