Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm by Adam Gillette
Wood appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
  Isn't there a "whole cadre of U.S. trustees that presumably can look out for the interests of the poor United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am by Amy Howe
  Unlike Kiobel, there is no real dispute that the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), the law on which the plaintiffs in Mohamad were seeking to rely, applies to conduct that occurred outside the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am by Gideon
Twenty five years ago yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued one if its most shameful opinions in recent history: McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:23 am by Andis Kaulins
But they voted for dilution of rights anyway, primarily to the detriment of the women of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Christopher v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:56 am by Sumter Camp
" Derrick Johnson would agree, but, unfortunately, the majority didn’t agree with Justice Scalia, and the Sixth Circuit didn't agree with Derrick Johnson.The issue in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm by Keith B. Hall
  The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the case, and a unanimous Court agreed with the Sacketts that they were entitled to a hearing. [read post]